>From: Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> >Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 16:59 >To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org> >Subject: [Ext] [DNSOP]Our reading of consensus on >draft-hardaker-dnsop-rfc8624-bis, and the "must-not-algorithm" docs.
>Option 1: Pivot this document from providing implementers with guidance >(“Implementers MUST NOT use Foo for signing”) to providing guidance to >operators instead (“Operators MUST NOT use Foo for signing”). I would tweak this question a bit, sparked by the idea the implementers’ job here is not to “use”: For operators, it’s a use/don’t use recommendation. For implementers, it’s a support/don’t support recommendation and a recommended ‘default’ value.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
