Hi dnsop wg. We have submitted an update to our rfc3901bis draft "DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines."
The changes can be seen below. Diff from v3 to v5(current): https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-03&url2=draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05&difftype=--html The main difference from the previous version is the addition of the following, after Geoff's comments on DNS over UDP/IPv6 not working properly on large responses. We added a reference to I-D.ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation to address the problem of IP fragmentation with IPv6. ``` Avoiding Fragmentation: IP fragmentation has been reported to be fragile [RFC8900]. Therefore, IP fragmentation should be avoided in order to treat both IPv4/IPv6 equally [I-D.ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation]. ``` I hope to hear from the community about how this document can be improved. Momoka ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-dra...@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 3:10 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.txt To: Momoka Yamamoto <momoka....@gmail.com>, Tobias Fiebig < tfie...@mpi-inf.mpg.de> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.txt has been successfully submitted by Momoka Yamamoto and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis Revision: 05 Title: DNS IPv6 Transport Operational Guidelines Date: 2024-04-30 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 9 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05.html HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-momoka-dnsop-3901bis-05 Abstract: This memo provides guidelines and documents Best Current Practice for operating authoritative and recursive DNS servers, given that queries and responses are carried in a mixed environment of IPv4 and IPv6 networks. It expands on RFC 3901 by now suggesting authoritative and iterative resolvers to operate on both IPv4 and IPv6. This document obsoletes RFC3901. (if approved) Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/momoka0122y/draft-dnsop-3901bis. The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
