Hi

Am 20.04.2024 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Thomassen:
[...]
The main question then is to get implementations updated. I'm thus copying a few implementers so they can comment w.r.t. making this change in their implementation. I suppose that barring their objections, it's fine to go ahead?

Updating our implementation wouldn't be a problem. It's a draft after all, so we did expect possible changes to happen during the process. I'd prefer the current short and generic '_signal' label, as I was under the assumption future things that want to signal something could use it as well and just replace the '_dsboot' label instead. But I do not have strong objections to changing it.

Best regards
Oli

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to