Hi
Am 20.04.2024 um 12:13 schrieb Peter Thomassen:
[...]
The main question then is to get implementations updated. I'm thus
copying a few implementers so they can comment w.r.t. making this change
in their implementation. I suppose that barring their objections, it's
fine to go ahead?
Updating our implementation wouldn't be a problem. It's a draft after
all, so we did expect possible changes to happen during the process.
I'd prefer the current short and generic '_signal' label, as I was under
the assumption future things that want to signal something could use it
as well and just replace the '_dsboot' label instead. But I do not have
strong objections to changing it.
Best regards
Oli
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
