Willem Toorop writes: > Should RFC 8767 stale data be ranked differently than fresh data? > Should EDNS Client Subnet play into ranking? > > I like your thinking! Yes, fresh data should replace stale data in > resolver caches
It's basically A- in your draft's hierarchy, I think, though the current structure gives each letter grade only one type of data for it and there's already an A-. However, I am also wondering about the A- as described, because it seems to suggest that an SOA in auth is less trustworthy than an SOA in ans. (Also, A and A- differ in "authoritative reply" vs "authoritative answer" which are seemingly describing the same thing.) I get that you're trying to indicate that NS in auth is lower than (correctly scoped) NS in ans, but it needs a little finagling, maybe just to call out explicitly NS rather than generalized data. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
