This errata seems to be valid. I have no idea why the DOI reference changed, but it appears to have changed since it was added to the document in November/December last year.
DW > On Mar 5, 2024, at 9:02 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9520, > "Negative Caching of DNS Resolution Failures". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1VbjSuWJx5oy1T-Ua7n1iI_SDgRrTt_Lvn9n-UDSifjZm8QaU9N4sQvIa93jzMNm9w2ZAEu2ZZOYvMsD2D7ioZ9QHTqV8jEHryfvOC9Tx53J1SGMrtcSZrHU0FlPrghJ9G7LQdzR6tAz3HpXQAu2riJ5I8LEqNUq0dskyvGu82WhekS82imHk9yVzGp8u8ozw9c-NL3ntpHCse3uefxc2S0p23gjiNSuXw-QixLt5evJjNhvMN3tmNfYG3pVeW77qaEXObECupbCrui7iTlHdbWBWQfvGlBDXEnNuROJctlQ/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7838 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Xiang Li <idealeer...@gmail.com> > > Section: 7.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > [TuDoor] > ... > DOI 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00046, 2024, > <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Ndam-xgpln4HSL9MzMooCbradzTQ5PEMlP-C7llZXR_QsFNWsA68gm8xBmU9jaFOqgnm7BjBC1NI_ZXm0rOe-tLsjRY_CN3DPRvyc_7keMJfXDyJjZDJoIf4ipET4heIuug5f5FPk6gaVflg8mieLUGystGVyQdYp33M4s_r9J1lviyIyLkYbktr7uF1eU-gsTb0DLKb-HHEXQLgBgYWKWuBI4OmG-4vqD8trbnBQdxl3vAl4ho6nC9xiIjQfKf3FZmXdFwqqvtx40N395Pbh19yaIbAP27FuDEsuUYRUXE/https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.ieeecomputersociety.org%2F10.1109%2FSP54263.2024.00046>. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > [TuDoor] > ... > DOI 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00172, 2024, > <https://secure-web.cisco.com/1vX7hBHQ3kVBiZNB97jq399CgHDbgfE9UmKzot0typPG8-r0Ailc8X8_wf8irT2gewux4XPBCQvjKnmp1bKaqZQW2nx9qV2vNxUkpd27-_Ik8sav1YnfzWGoi7Igz1O52lG8iU1ZUuHS3Xx9xPgDZFHKil6g_N4aRWTA6XZr3VQ2dE_qJbYC4ninhDMlv5dDD0I0JwB1Gif8HmQYTHtDftVF7QG2wWoFCBLnRrZ8p_ubWyd5RKVWs1yMT9l1O7TVsWCD6JnOgJ-O28oGQjUPHiGzm6FxcvW8hp-pd2t8k7q4/https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.ieeecomputersociety.org%2F10.1109%2FSP54263.2024.00172>. > > > Notes > ----- > The reference link has changed to 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00172 from > 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00046 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9520 (draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Negative Caching of DNS Resolution Failures > Publication Date : December 2023 > Author(s) : D. Wessels, W. Carroll, M. Thomas > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Domain Name System Operations > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
