On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 11:34 PM Kazunori Fujiwara <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> dnsop WG, > > "unrelated" (or, previosly called as out-of-bailiwick) name server names > are > necessary for DNS hosting providers. > Fujiwara-san, I have to nitpick your very first statement above. Many DNS providers do offer the ability to pick "vanity" or "custom" nameserver names, which their customers can use to deploy in-domain nameservers. This could be because the customer really does want to make DNS resolution efficient. But it could be for other reasons (branding, or some other perceived security reason). My employer uses such features extensively. This is not simply the customer pointing their own names at the provider's DNS server addresses. This is a contract with the provider that they will maintain that association and won't change the IP addresses from under them (the "going stale" problem) without advance notice and coordination. I think I agree with your general goal, but as others have remarked, there is no way to enforce this, so at best this could be a recommendation. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
