I'm not a big fan of "whereas" clauses, partially because I'm related to rather large number of lawyers. Does anyone object to the following?
Since the priming response is not a referral, root server addresses in the priming response are not considered glue records. Thus, RFC 9471 does not apply to the priming response and root servers are not required to set the TC bit if not all root server addresses fit within message size constraints. There are no requirements on the number of root server addresses that a root server must include in a priming response. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
