Thanks Roy. Would a new working group be open to skeptics? I remain
concerned about gradually increasing systemic complexity, and I have
some ideas about how some stated goals of the DELEG proposal could have
complexity increase precisely linear to new functionality -- so,
extending beyond but not replacing the NS RRset model.
But I would not want to crash a party.
Vixie
re:
Roy Arends wrote on 2024-02-01 03:46:
Dear DNSOP,
After the DNSOP Interim, I had a short discussion with Warren Kumari about the
vagueness of the request. I have now updated the request to reflect the
sentiment of the interim and to make sure that there is the opportunity to form
a WG if there is the desire to do so.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bofreq-arends-deleg-capabilities/
Warmly,
Roy
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
P Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
