Again thanks to mr Hoffman for minutes, here they are and uploaded in the datatracker and our git repo
Thank you one and all for having great productive conversations! tim
DNSOP WG Interim meeting 2024-01-30 1700 UTC Chairs: Benno Overeinder, Suzanne Woolf, Tim Wicinski Minutes taken by Paul Hoffman Only stuff said that happened at the mic is reported here Agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-interim-2024-dnsop Materials: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2024-dnsop-01/session/dnsop Intro from the chairs This interim is for bootstrapping the topic before IETF119 Presentation on state of DELEG draft, Ralf Weber https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dnsop-deleg/ Legacy resolver compliance testing results, Roy Arends Open discussion points in the draft Viktor Dukovni: Didn't see Microsoft's resolver tested; very different in origin Found the draft more confusing than illuminating Examples are haphazard Wants reorganization Wants a motivations document; what problem are we solving Roy: Maybe split the document into different topics This document is core Another document can have all the offerings Another document that gives an introduction to the whole thing This is a -00 Ralf: Wanted to get it ready for the interim OK with splitting out motivations into a different draft Suzanne: this discussion is not about specifics in the draft Initial reflections on DELEG, Paul Wouters Open discussion: discussion and reflection on interim Suzanne: Process discussion not today Ralf: PaulW's proposal #1 didn't want to do this to prolong DELEG Can happen in parallel There are plenty of implementations that don't share names Viktor: The idea of having more records at the parent needs motivation, but seems mostly harmless Putting more records puts more pressure on resolvers under attack Warren Kumari: Process-related BoF request was for extensions IESG doesn't feel that you can have a BoF for something that doesn't exist Wants the BoF to be about DELEG itself No assumption that people have been at interim Maybe a WG-forming BoF Need to be careful that DNSOPs folks participate Thus, in OPS Scheduled right after DNSOP so that there is overlap Roy: Will talk with Warren about the BoF request Viktor: Make the draft shorter and clearer Benno: Keep contributing to the DNSOP mailing list, specific text can go into the repo Peter Thomassen: Where to discuss this? Benno: On the mailing list Suzanne: This helps identify new work that might be spun off Benno: Protocol discussion on the mailing list Ralf: People coming early to DNS-OARC next week, there is an informal room on Wednesday
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
