On 19 Dec 2023, at 03:34, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Geoff Huston wrote: > >> I am in support of adoption by the Working Group. The process of peer review >> has proved to be highly valuable over the years and the result is generally >> a more robust framework for critical elements of the DNS infrastructure. > > I agree, but also understand the situation could be strange. What if the > WG would want some text but the authors representing the Root Zone > operator cannot or do not want to do this? I guess at that point the > document would have to move to the ISE ?
The reverse situation is also slightly strange, since as I understand it the ISE would need a conflict review to confirm that there's nothing in the individual submission that conflicts with the normal business of the working group, determination of which is maybe not 100% obvious (or at least depends on your point of view). I think proceeding with adoption for now and crossing bridges later if and when we come to them is easiest. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
