Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Gorry for the TSVART review. I have only two questions - is this protocol (error reporting) not applicable to DoQ? The question came as TCP is the preferred transport and only tells what to do when UDP is used for queries and reports, so wondering what happens when QUIC is as transport for DNS. - what would be a typical rate of error reporting? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
