John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this useful and readable specification. I have one comment – Section 6.1 says, “The EDNS0 Report-Channel option MUST NOT be included in queries.” Section 6.2 says, “There is no requirement that the EDNS0 Report-Channel option is present in queries.” While the two are not technically in conflict, the second understates; it seems like you could, and should, remove it. But perhaps there’s some subtlety I’m not understanding here. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
