That’s going to be a pretty sparse bitmap. Can you think of a specific
scenario where that makes the message shorter?

Op vr 17 nov 2023 om 06:50 schreef Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io>

>
> On 11/14/23 12:50, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> > Abstract:
> >
> >     This document specifies a method for a DNS client to request
> >     additional DNS record types to be delivered alongside the primary
> >     record type specified in the question section of a DNS query.
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bellis-dnsext-multi-qtypes/
>
> I think this draft proposal a reasonable method for requesting multiple
> record types.
>
> Section 3.2.1 has three occurrences of "SHOULD/MUST attempt to" do things,
> such as:
>
>     MUST attempt to return all specified RR types except where ...
>
> Under which circumstances is the "attempt" sufficient? (Is the attempt
> allowed to fail under circumstances beyond what's in the "except" clause?)
>
> Generally, my feeling is that both "MUST attempt" and "SHOULD attempt"
> actually are "SHOULD".
>
>
> In Section 3.2.3:
>
>     If the DNS client sets the "DNSSEC OK" (DO) bit in the query
>     then the server MUST also return the related DNSSEC records
>     that would have been returned in a standalone query for the
>     same QTYPE.
>
> That MUST is stronger than the "MUST attempt" for the rdata itself. I
> guess what's meant is something like "MUST return the related DNSSEC
> records for any returned RRsets, in the same way as they would have been
> returned ...".
>
> Also, "for the same QTYPE" is unclear, it might be misread to refer to the
> QTYPE appearing in the question section. I guess what's meant is "for the
> respective QTYPE".
>
>
> Regarding Section 3.1, I tend to agree with Paul's perspective on QTYPE
> encoding via bit map.
>
> Best,
> Peter
>
> --
> https://desec.io/
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to