> On Sep 5, 2023, at 3:52 AM, Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for working on this document - I'm not a DNS expert but it looks like 
> good advice.
> 
> A couple of minor comments for your consideration:
> 
> (1) p 2, sec 1.  Introduction
> 
>   This document updates [RFC2308] to require negative caching of DNS
>   resolution failures and provides additional examples of resolution
>   failures.
> 
> Perhaps "caching of all DNS resolution failures"?

Agreed.

> 
> 
> (2) p 2, sec 1.1.  Motivation
> 
>   RFC Editor: We'd like your thoughts on moving the Motivation and
>   Related Work sections to appendices.  Is that a preferred style?
> 
> Not the RFC editor, but I would keep the motivation here, as a subsection of 
> the introduction.

Excellent, thanks for the feedback.

DW

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to