Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09 Thank you for the work put into this document: it is really important to have a common vocabulary and specific terms. I have appreciated the removal of 'old but confusing' terms such as lame delegation and bailiwick (the latter being very obscure for non-English readers). My review of the diff to RFC 8499 found no issues. Special thanks to Benno Overeinder for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. Please note that Suresh Krishnan is the Internet directorate reviewer and you may want to consider this int-dir review as well when it will be available (no need to wait for it though): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis/reviewrequest/18093/ Regards, -éric _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
