Geoff We had a DNS directorate review done https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-00-dnsdir-early-ma-2023-08-29/ And perhaps I was basing my vibes off of the review plus the authors. That is on me. But also, we chairs sometimes see the need to use the working group last call to put more eyes onto a document.
tim On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:30 PM Geoff Huston <gih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 14 Sep 2023, at 6:25 am, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:20 PM Joe Abley <jab...@strandkip.nl> wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > > > Op 13 sep. 2023 om 23:06 heeft Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > > >> > >> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis > >> "Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries" > >> > >> Current versions of the draft is available here: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis/ > > > > This draft seems to still have open questions in sections 3.1 and 3.3. > Are those intended to be taken out before the document proceeds, or do they > need discussion from the working group before the last call? > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > Joe > > > > One of our hopes is during this WGLC we can address these issues. But > yes, they are open. > > My preference would be for a largely complete document to be Last Called. > It might also be help to have a DNS Directorate review performed at this > point to assist in both highlighting and working with the draft authors to > resolve these incomplete areas. > > Geoff >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
