DNSOP,

This version of the draft addresses various comments from the Artart, Genart, 
and Dnsdir reviewers:

   *  Artart review: minor editorial clarifications
   *  Genart review: remove confusing and superfluous section
      references.
   *  Genart review: clarify resolution failure caching time range.
   *  Genart review: better define DNS transports
   *  Dnsdir review: clarify FORMERR response retries.

DW


> On Aug 22, 2023, at 4:47 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System
> Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
> 
>   Title           : Negative Caching of DNS Resolution Failures
>   Authors         : Duane Wessels
>                     William Carroll
>                     Matthew Thomas
>   Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07.txt
>   Pages           : 19
>   Date            : 2023-08-22
> 
> Abstract:
>   In the DNS, resolvers employ caching to reduce both latency for end
>   users and load on authoritative name servers.  The process of
>   resolution may result in one of three types of responses: (1) a
>   response containing the requested data; (2) a response indicating the
>   requested data does not exist; or (3) a non-response due to a
>   resolution failure in which the resolver does not receive any useful
>   information regarding the data's existence.  This document concerns
>   itself only with the third type.
> 
>   RFC 2308 specifies requirements for DNS negative caching.  There,
>   caching of type (1) and (2) responses is mandatory and caching of
>   type (3) responses is optional.  This document updates RFC 2308 to
>   require negative caching for DNS resolution failures.
> 
>   RFC 4035 allows DNSSEC validation failure caching.  This document
>   updates RFC 4035 to require caching for DNSSEC validation failures.
> 
>   RFC 4697 prohibits aggressive requerying for NS records at a failed
>   zone's parent zone.  This document updates RFC 4697 to expand this
>   requirement to all query types and to all ancestor zones.
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1xhHP4VLQU5cOfCVEYviz3Xe_zigUgwRx4lgc4GJH6EcH9YgPMiS0mJ4bXYeGdOAH4CcwK6hjzuoP8H1tyglsbc6aCN-G6lUXhozvkS8QdNY331E0DULUvm9YUqAeammQvXwtwOaikdoac4hJtLb5b_9-BUVH3cL-BjKNFrmjar_4DUIJrc8ZSr7SAHM9rBxdSBuF8sb8c8ZcOM6GqHKprLJSG2OMlg8wlC84hH9pIJuYDY1vK6QklKJ47SPwy6gFrYGf-d7JeW0sBnHfw2fvppMYjhP_FOPvNvz08bNId_0/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdnsop
> 

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to