Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. As a side note, I think it is the first I-D that I read that uses the RFC 6761 'test.' ;-) No specific comments but I wanted to thank two people in addition to the authors. Special thanks to Suzanne Woolf for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. Other thanks to Tim Winters, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request), please consider this int-dir review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-08-intdir-telechat-winters-2023-05-31/ Regards, -éric _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
