Moin! On 23 May 2023, at 22:18, Tommy Pauly wrote:
> Using length=2 and INFO-CODE=0 sounds fine to me. > > For the dependency on draft-ietf-add-resolver-info, I don't think we need to > impose that dependency. I'd much prefer to allow clients to look at that > optionally, but still be able to include the hint and use the extra text if > it parses correctly. I agree with Tommy here. It is a nice to have (MAY/SHOULD) rather than a “MUST” as it currently is stated in the draft. So long -Ralf ——- Ralf Weber _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
