Yeah, that's a better way to put it. But the main point still stands,
that it would be a signficant operational change to insist that all
delegated NS be active when delegated, and even moreso to insist that
they continue to be active. ...
Well, OK, you do that, half the emails bounce, half of what's delivered is
reported as spam, and the third half are ignored. Now what?
In practice it isn’t quite as bad as that. Require registrars to refuse
renewals until the issues are addressed.
Please see "signficant operational change" above.
My feeling is that if it's not important enough for *you* to have your DNS
working, it's not important for *me* either. I'm happy to help people who
are having trouble fixing problems, but not to waste time on people who
don't care.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
