I've read this draft.

I think its a simple and straightforward proposal. It explicitly notes
the security issue that its not covered by DNSSEC, it has
implementations, and it had a good discussion run 2021/2022 which was
overwhelmingly positive.

I had no problems understanding the intent. its really clear and
straightforward.

It's a debug tool. It isn't going to be something I expect to use, but
I like the idea if something goes awry in the responses I am seeing I
can ask the authority to tell me what SOA serial I should expect to
see, that has the response state they're giving me for the specific
query. Thats distinct from ZONEMD which is a DNSSEC signed state of an
entire zone (assuming it can be done) which is a different class of
check on zone state related to serial. I like both. They're different.
That said, you COULD point to ZONEMD in this one in the security
considerations, but I wouldnt make it normative. It's just another way
to check the state of a zone.

The non-transitive thing is about the only point of "well...." -but
its unsigned data: how could you trust it, if you can't verify through
a third (transiting) party? And the draft says this: it's undefined
behaviour.

I truly think this is that very rare bird: "looks good to me ship it"
in 2 WG adopted draft edits.

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:08 PM Suzanne Woolf <swo...@pir.org> wrote:
>
> Colleagues,
>
>
> This email begins a Working Group Last Call for 
> draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-02 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion/).
>
> If you've reviewed this document and think it's ready for publication, please 
> let us and the WG know, by responding on-list to this message. We 
> particularly need to hear from implementers and operators whether this EDNS 
> option is implementable and useful.
>
> If you don't think it's ready, and have specific concerns or suggestions, 
> please let us know about those too.
>
> The Last Call will be two weeks, ending on Thursday 11 May.
>
> Thanks to everyone who's offered comments and suggestions on the draft to 
> date.
>
>
> Suzanne, Tim, and Benno
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to