i don't know why it was rejected as spam but his sysadmin might.
--- Begin Message ---
This is the mail system at host ietfa.amsl.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<be...@nlnetlabs.nl> (expanded from <expand-dnsop-cha...@virtual.ietf.org>):
host mx.soverin.net[185.233.34.143] said: 554 5.7.1 Spam message rejected
(in reply to end of DATA command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; ietfa.amsl.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: EAF7AC1519A1
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; paul@redbarn.org
Arrival-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 08:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; benno@NLnetLabs.nl
Original-Recipient: rfc822;expand-dnsop-chairs@virtual.ietf.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.1
Remote-MTA: dns; mx.soverin.net
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 5.7.1 Spam message rejected
--- Begin Message ---
Shumon Huque wrote on 2023-04-26 08:43:
I support adoption too.
As I've mentioned earlier, this mechanism is widely deployed and needs a
published specification. Adopting the work will also allow us to
formally specify an accurate NXDOMAIN signal (and work out its related
details more fully).
Shumon.
+1.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 8:54 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com>
...
Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
willing to contribute and review.
--
P Vixie
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
