This seems fine. I do wonder whether 'alt' is appropriate -- 'alternative' begs the question of 'alternative to what?' and the answer is a technical detail that most Internet users are blissfully unaware of. It seems to me that it'd be better to choose something meaningful to users.
That said, I struggle to suggest anything specific, and we have plenty of examples of seemingly-relative names still working in practice -- e.g., 'New York.' Cheers, > On 14 Mar 2023, at 1:21 am, The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'The ALT Special Use Top Level > Domain' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > last-c...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2023-04-10. Exceptionally, comments may > be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning > of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document reserves a TLD label, "alt" to be used in non-DNS > contexts. It also provides advice and guidance to developers > developing alternative namespaces. > > [ This document is being collaborated on in Github at > <https://github.com/wkumari/draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld>. The most > recent version of the document, open issues, etc should all be > available here. The authors (gratefully) accept pull requests. ] > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > ietf-annou...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
