> On 6 Mar 2023, at 04:20, Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> wrote: > > 2.) As for the "NXNAME" rrtype, I'd like to propose using rrtype 0 (the NULL > type). So far it only has meaning for "type covered" fields in signature > records such as SIG(0) (RFC 2931). There appears to be no collision with > usage in the NSEC type bitmap, and IMHO it appears to be a very natural meta > type fit. ("This is NULL, There Really Is Nothing Underneath.") NULL is type 10. This was assigned in RFC 1035. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Ralf Weber
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compac... Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Existence Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Exist... Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of E... paul=40redbarn . org
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of E... John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of E... Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial ... Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact De... Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Existence Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Existence Johan Stenstam
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Existence Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] Updated: Compact Denial of Exist... Johan Stenstam