> On 6 Mar 2023, at 04:20, Peter Thomassen <pe...@desec.io> wrote:
> 
> 2.) As for the "NXNAME" rrtype, I'd like to propose using rrtype 0 (the NULL 
> type). So far it only has meaning for "type covered" fields in signature 
> records such as SIG(0) (RFC 2931). There appears to be no collision with 
> usage in the NSEC type bitmap, and IMHO it appears to be a very natural meta 
> type fit. ("This is NULL, There Really Is Nothing Underneath.")

NULL is type 10.  This was assigned in RFC 1035.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to