On Feb 24, 2023, at 2:41 PM, Wessels, Duane <dwessels=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Thank you authors for the update which addressed my concern about formatting > of the special use considerations as an enumerated list.
You weren't the only one who brow-beat us about that... > Forgive me if I am being difficult, but I feel that the first sentence of the > privacy section, which says “... so should not attempt to be resolved using > the global DNS” is in contradiction with #4 which says "and SHOULD NOT > perform any special handling”, and to some extent #3 which says "Regular DNS > resolution APIs and libraries are not expected to recognize or treat names in > the .alt pseudo-TLD differently”. > > Given the wording of the considerations in section 3.2, maybe just delete “, > and so...” from that sentence in the privacy section? Good catch! Yes, definitely. Will fix in -22. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
