On 14.12.22 12:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2022, at 11:29, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > We're off in the woods again.  Let's keep these two principles in mind:
> > 
> > The DNS resolution mechanisms are not expected to resolve, let alone secure 
> > names ending in .ALT.
> > How other resolution mechanisms secure names is their affair.
> I don’t think people disagree on this.
> 
> 
> >> On 14.12.22 17:13, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> "bob.foo.alt" still squarely falls into "my" namespace
> >> It is indeed not “yours”. 
> > ... from the perspective of DNS.  Whether it is "yours" or "mine" from the 
> > perspective of GNS is a matter for GNS to resolve (for example).
> > 
> I was not talking from the perspective of IETF or DNS. The .alt is the Wild 
> West. Even GNS cannot claim exclusivity of a chunk of it. It is competing 
> with all the other unregulated namespaces.
> 

Then the draft should just say that. And not insinuate that as a dev I
can or should do something about that.

> Martin said he cannot help other alternative namespaces using the same 
> alternative namespace as he is using. I merely confirmed that and recommend 
> that if he is looking for exclusivity, he has to leave the Wild West behind 
> and go to a regulated space and play within the rules set out there to get 
> his exclusive namespace.
> 

If there is an obvious way to do it, the draft could give an example. Whatever 
you
mean by "go to a regulated space" should be given with clear example.
But as you well know, your wording is simply not without problems (IANA
SU-TLD registry is technically also/still a "regulated space" that would
fall within your wording).

My best interpretation of the sentence is that it low-key defines a fcfs-style 
self-governance of .alt. Which would also be fine, but I have an issue
with the unclear wording (i.e. I should not have interpret what the
meaning of "wholly responsible for dealing with collisions" is).

BR
Martin

> Paul
> 
> 
> 
> > Eliot
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > DNSOP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to