Some time back Tony Finch proposed a 2317bis - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc2317bis-00 which the WG adopted but died for lack of interest.
It would be useful to revise this document tim On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:14 AM Havard Eidnes <he=40uninett...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi, while editing draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation, it > occured > > to me that the automatic reverse that > > draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options could enable > > better/simpler RFC2317 delegation for IPv4 subnets. > > > > My experience is that some of the pushback for doing 2317 is that there > is > > sane way to automate it, and too many confusing ways to do it. > > > > So, I wrote: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-richardson-ipv4-reverse-in-v6/ > > > > which basically says to point the CNAMEs into the IPv6 delegation that is > > "already" (will have been) being done. > > The actual convention to use isn't really specified by 2317, only > a few examples are given. This one should work just as well as > any other convention, and if this makes it easier to use, I'm all > for it. > > Best regards, > > - Håvard > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
