Yes, I was both factually and technically incorrect. The best kind. No.. wait..
Your point is well made and important. Nothing is "moving" here and whats happening is IETF Is getting out of being in the space. -G On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:13 AM David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > > George, > > This is unrelated to alt-tld, but just as a point of clarification: > > On Oct 25, 2022, at 5:17 PM, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > > Just because we're punting ALT into their process, and moving .INT into their > process […] > > > I presume you’re talking about > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davies-int-historic/. I’m unsure why > you think .INT is moving. Kim can correct me if I’m wrong, but to clarify, > the processing of .INT is not moving: it is and always has been handled by > the IANA team and it will continue that way. The only thing that is changing > is removing the historical “international databases” delegations created when > .INT was (according to RFC 1591) for “organizations established by > international treaties, _or international databases_” (Emphasis added). The > IAB doc from 2000(!) > https://web.archive.org/web/20090822012543/http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/iab-arpa-stmt.txt > (didn’t bother trying to find it on the IAB website — the link on Wikipedia > is wrong) might be illuminating. > > Regards, > -drc > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
