On Oct 19, 2022, at 6:38 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for working on this specification. I think a BCP would be helpful. > > I have two minor comments - > > - Section 1: if we can elaborate on "modern DNSSEC" that would be more useful > to understand the characteristic of the modern DNSSEC rather just calling it > modern.
Good catch! > - Section 1.2: it says - "reading the RFCs should also include looking > for the related errata", may be it better to clarify if we mean all the > erratas > with all the states or just verified ones. I think you meant to send this to rfc-inter...@rfc-editor.org. :-) The question of which errata should and should not be read is a tricky one, because some editorial errata greatly help the readers' understanding, while others are trivial. <https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-hoffman-dnssec/commit/cad21> --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
