Quick meta-question: If there is new information that would suggest additions to the document as helpful (improves document), which would be the normal or best approach:
- Ask for additions to the document during the WGLC itself - Offer comments on the addition alongside a request to delay the WGLC until the authors have had a chance to review/respond to the comments - State the opinion that the document is not ready for publication, based on the comments Brian On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:22 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for > draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements > > Current versions of the draft is available here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements/ > > The Current Intended Status of this document is: Informational > > Please review the draft and offer relevant comments. > If this does not seem appropriate please speak out. > If someone feels the document is *not* ready for publication, please speak > out with your reasons. > > This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on: 2 > November 2022 > > thanks > tim > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
