> Il 17/10/2022 08:44 CEST Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> ha scritto: > > Let's please leave Internet lawyering to lawyers. If people want a > legal opinion on this draft, the IETF does have resources for that. > > [...] > > No matter what we say in the ALT draft, someone could burden the IETF > with a new draft. People do so every day. If it gains sufficient > support, it would have to be at least considered, no matter the topic. > And again, I suspect most of these sorts of documents are more likely to > flow to the ISE or perhaps a future IRTF RG. As the current ISE, that > is a burden I would gladly bear, because there is the opportunity to > help the Internet community, including the IETF and ICANN. > > I also have no problem rejecting trivial or bad proposals.
Well, I'm just waiting for the request to register amazon.alt. (or xxx.alt, or ru[ssia].alt, or <insertblasphemyhere>.alt, which some people will do just for fun) Unless, of course, you mean that the ISE will adjudicate trademarks, define which strings are offensive and determine whether an applicant has the right to use the name of a country or geographical entity, thus deciding whether a proposal is "trivial or bad" or not. -- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
