As one of the authors of this RFC I agree with Mark Andrews' assessment. Also, there is no section 8749 in this rfc.
-Dan > On Sep 13, 2022, at 14:41, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > The word ‘deleted’ does not appear in RFC8749. The errata makes no sense. I > suggest that this errata is REJECTED. > > -- > Mark Andrews > >> On 14 Sep 2022, at 06:30, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> >> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8749, >> "Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7131 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: an <minhan0...@gmail.com> >> >> Section: 8749 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> deleted >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> deleted one >> >> Notes >> ----- >> off rfc >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC8749 (draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-02) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic >> Status >> Publication Date : March 2020 >> Author(s) : W. Mekking, D. Mahoney >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Domain Name System Operations >> Area : Operations and Management >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
