On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 1:47 PM UTC, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > This is good feedback, and it helps us. We should also hear from > other implementers about their opinion on this.
in an unreleased recursive name server, all parts of resimprove were implemented as of 2005 or so, which is what led to the publication of the original resimprove draft a few years later. i don't think this qualifies the authors and operators of that software as "implementers" as used in the above request, but if so, let me say i don't need it to be mandatory. see also my reply up-thread speaking as a draft co-author. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
