I think your instinct is correct, Tim. It’s not an optimization to bypass discussion as part of a call for adoption. By asking us to consider six drafts at once, and discuss none of them, you create a strong likelihood of insufficient review.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 03:45 Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All > > We have six documents that have requested adoption from the working group. > My opinion is that we send out adoption calls for all of these and let the > working group sort it out, but was told that is just crazy. Since Warren > loves these poll things, we put another one together on all the documents > in question. > > > https://forms.gle/TVKeokYvnU55eq2x7 > > > We'll run this poll for two weeks and end on the 9th of July. However, we > have a chai9rs call on the 5th of July and I'm confident we'll have an > obvious clear set of documents to begin adoption calls on. > > thanks > tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
