Unfortunately, the reverse zone is very often out of reach for those who use the IP range and trying to do classless reverse delegation (RFC 2317) for those who have less than a /24 is even harder to get.

Paul 

Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone

On Jun 21, 2022, at 23:30, rubensk=40nic...@dmarc.ietf.org wrote:



On 22 Jun 2022, at 00:07, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:

It appears that  <rube...@nic.br> said:
-=-=-=-=-=-


Hi.

During a meeting today of ROW (https://regiops.net), the I-D on CDS bootstrapping by using a DNSSEC-signed name at name server
zone (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping/) was discussed.
In that discussion, it was mentioned that the current draft only supports out-of-bailiwick name servers; I replied that the
same principle could be applied to in-bailiwick name server by usage of the reverse DNS zones for IPv4 and IPv6.

Urrgh. In principle, you can put anything you want in a reverse zone.
(Send mail to jo...@18.183.57.64.in-addr.arpa. and it'll work.)

That's my recollection as well, but as the saying goes, code is law. Although in this case only registry/registrar and DNS operator are required to interoperate for the bootstrapping process. 

In practice, I doubt that enough reverse zones are signed or that the
provisoning crudware that people use for reverse zones would work
often enough to be worth trying to do this. I did some surveys of
zones and found that in-bailiwick NS are quite uncommon, only a few
percent of the ones in large gTLDs.

I don't expect the IP space used for DNS servers to be managed thru an IPAM system of sorts. But if one is used, it's unlikely they provision a zone-cut as required in the draft. 

The prevalence among the overall DNS system is indeed low, but I wonder what % this represents within services that allow all of DNSSEC, CDS Bootstrapping and in-bailiwick DNS servers, like Business and Enterprise plans in Cloudflare: https://developers.cloudflare.com/dns/additional-options/custom-nameservers/ .


Or if supporting this type of DNS servers can help the adoption of this draft for the 99.9% use case of out-of-bailiwick servers. If not, we could be adding a new piece to the DNS Camel... 



Rubens





_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to