If this space is not extensible from non-IETF RFCs, we’ll have missed the mark. The space is designed to be large (65K) to allow new work to easily use this extensibility. We don’t need to be too conservative with this space.
I disagree that there wouldn’t be good experts — we have authors of the document who have seen it through, and we have more people using this RR and gaining expertise. Expert review is the right balance here. Tommy > On Mar 22, 2022, at 9:24 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 9:10 AM Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk > <mailto:r...@bellis.me.uk>> wrote: > I am concerned that the set of Expert Reviewers necessary to handle SVCB > needs to have both expert DNS experience *and* detailed knowledge of the > SVCB model for this to work. > > I am not sure there's anybody who fits that criteria. > > Specification Required also assumes a community that can produce them, which > presumably contains the right experts. > > Are we actually moving toward IETF Review here? > > -MSK > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
