All, When we started preparing a slide deck for the usual chairs’ slides and updating the working group on what has been going on, we quickly realized it was probably better to keep the chairs’ time in the meeting to a minimum. So there will be a very quick overview in the meeting but more substance in this note, which is being sent to the WG list.
* Updates We have found the interim meetings to be effective and focused, and we'll plan on doing 1-2 between every IETF. We are currently looking at the week of April 25th and the week of June 6th. We are going to start adopting work again starting this week. Our selection is based on the feedback from our first poll. We'll be sending out notes on these two this week: draft-thomassen-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping draft-wisser-dnssec-automation As for other work, Benno has been putting together another poll to glean suggestions from the working group. Of course, nothing is stopping authors from discussing their work on the mailing list. * DNSSEC BCP As many saw on the mailing list, Paul Hoffman has a suggestion on packaging the existing DNSSEC documents into a BCP. We think this is a fine idea all around, and we want to figure out how to make it happen while being respectful of everyone's time and energy. We'll work with Warren to make a plan and share it on the list in the next couple of weeks. * Today’s Presentations We are aware that several of these drafts being presented are initial versions with little mailing list discussion. Our philosophy has always been "welcoming, with time permitting" with emphasis on existing work. Another way to look at this is that the interims have been proven effective, which allows time for mixing new ideas with work-in-progress ------- In addition to the interims, we’ve been working to support more interaction between DNSOP and other groups, inside the IETF and outside. The chairs of the DNS-related WGs have met before each of the last couple of IETFs, to make sure we’re aware of the major issues each group is dealing with. You might remember that we had a joint interim requested by the ADD chairs to talk about local-scope DNS in the context of their work, which they found helpful. And DNSOP chairs regularly join meetings of TLD operators, ICANN-based technical groups, and informal working groups on topics such as DoH and DNSSEC deployment. Our participation isn’t to speak for the WG but to inform others about what DNSOP is doing and to encourage them to be heard in the IETF. -------- Document Status draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements AUTH-48 draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https IESG Eval:Revised-ID Needed draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-04 Being Discussed today Q: does the WG think "referral glue" is clearer than current definitions in 8499? (This is the last gating item on 8499-bis) draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-06 Authors are revising in accordance with WG advice– main result has been slowly driving the iteration number down. draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation-06 Authors have suggested text for a revision based on feedback on list and in interim and are finalising with chairs to prepare draft for WGLC. draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02 New version with two mechanisms (extensive and simple mechanisms) with an open question on to keep just the simple mechanism. (This feels like a topic for the next interim) draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-03 Chairs feel this is just waiting for the Referral Glue discussions draft-ietf-dnsop-rrserial draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-05 draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-error-reporting-01 If the authors of these three drafts send a note to the mailing list with an update, so the group will know what the next steps are. ---------
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
