Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-tcp-requirements/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work on this document. Many thanks to Jean Mahoney for her ART ART review: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/YAoRhQIrKn4g0L6XFZvV45bWL44/. I only have one very minor comments, to take or leave as you please: headers are 40 bytes (versus 20 without options in IPv4). Second, it seems as though some people have misinterpreted IPv6's required minimum MTU of 1280 as a required maximum. Third, fragmentation in FP: The "some people" is quite cryptic, in my opinion. What people? Does this come from analyzing implementations? Then it would probably be good to state so instead. Francesca _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
