On Sep 29, 2021, at 9:15 AM, Martin Duke <martin.h.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for clarifying. If 4033-4035 fully replaced 3658,
They really do. > then one of them should have picked up the specification of the registry that > 3658 established. Not "one of them", unfortunately. The semantics for the DS record from 3658 are spread out in 4034 and 4035 (which have a lot of other things in them as well). > Maybe this is something that could be addressed in this document, or perhaps > somewhere else; I'd like to have the discussion. If the scope is "what does this particular IANA registry page list as references", maybe this is not in scope for this document (which only updates the registration requirements), but instead in scope for a discussion between the IESG and IANA. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
