[ DNSOP to BCC to limit cross-posting ] Speaking as an individual contributor, I have read the draft and support adoption in DNSSD.
David On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:31 AM Chris Box <chris.box.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > WG members, > > This email starts a call to adopt > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sekar-dns-ul-03 into the > DNSSD working group. > > What is this? Abstract: > This document proposes a new EDNS0 option that can be used by DNS > Update clients and DNS servers to include a lease lifetime in a DNS > Update or response, allowing a server to garbage collect stale > resource records that have been added by DNS Updates > > Adoption means that formal change control passes from the authors to the > working group. All subsequent substantive changes require WG rough > consensus. Adoption represents a commitment that the DNSSD WG will spend > time on the draft, with the aim of progressing it towards publication. > > Note that in theory the draft could fit the charters of both DNSOP and > DNSSD, but we're proposing DNSSD as this specific functionality is required > as part of draft-ietf-dnssd-srp > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp/> which is already > well advanced. The relevant charter text is: > > 2. To develop an improved, scalable solution for service discovery > that can operate in multi-link networks, where devices may be > in neighboring or non-neighboring links, applicable to > the scenarios above. The solution will consider tradeoffs between > reusing/extending existing protocols and developing entirely new > protocols. > > This email is being copied to DNSOP to solicit additional feedback from > the expertise there, but note this is NOT a call to adopt into DNSOP. > > You should be aware this draft is covered by an IPR disclosure. Details of > Apple's licensing terms can be found at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1236/. > > Within DNSSD we are asking two questions: > 1) If you have read this six-page draft and are content with it, or would > like to amend/discuss it further inside the working group, please speak up > now. > 2) If you believe that this document is not something the DNSSD working > group should be working on, please also say so. > > For this call to succeed, we'll need statements of explicit support from > people who have read the draft. The document does not have to be perfect, > but it needs to be solving a problem the WG wants to solve in a way > approximately as described in the draft. > > Please send statements in support or against, as responses to this email. > This call will be open until 2021-09-03 23:59 UTC. > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > dnssd mailing list > dn...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
