Roy Arends <r...@dnss.ec> writes: > Essentially, instead of making the pond safe, we’ll have a warning > sign that using the pond is at their own risk.
The wording of said warning sign is the critical element, IMHO. Certainly my support of the document greatly depends on said wording. In the end, there should be a goal behind why we want to publish something. If that goal is "know people do this. don't do this. please stop", then that may be a reasonable goal. If we're just going to document history, without recommendations (to stop), then I think it may bring more harm than good. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
