On 12 May 2021, at 17:39, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > It appears that Joe Abley <jab...@hopcount.ca> said: > >> Do you know of an example of a DNS authoritative or recursive server that >> does return truncated RRSets in the ANSWER section? > > A lot return truncated glue in the ADDITIONAL section. Are we sure that > wouldn't be an issue with SVCB? > I honestly don't know.
I agree that truncation in the ADDITIONAL section is expected. Since the SVCB is expected to be used in RRSets with more than one member RR (different SVCB RRs with the same owner name and class are explicitly contemplated by the draft) it already has to accommodate that (which I think is probably a noop, since it doesn't seem to me that SVCB has different requirements in that regard to any other RRType). I think Brian's point was that you can rely upon RRSets being intact in the ANSWER section. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
