On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:48 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:01:42AM +0200, > Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote > a message of 10 lines which said: > > > The Name:Wreck compression pointer issue > > Also > <https://www.scmagazine.com/home/security-news/vulnerabilities/namewreck-is-the-latest-collision-between-tcp-ip-and-the-standards-process/> > talks about what IETF should do. (The article contains several errors > about the RFC process.) > > > “I mean I don’t want to be the one telling the [Internet Engineering > > Task Force] how to do their work. Things have worked for more than > > 40 years on the internet because of the RFC systems,” he said. “But > > indeed, I do believe that it’s time that we think of an > > alternative.”
I think that the authors of the draft could consult this ? https://www.ietf.org/standards/rfcs/vulnerabilities/ > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
