On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:01:42AM +0200,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 10 lines which said:

> The Name:Wreck compression pointer issue
> <https://www.forescout.com/company/resources/namewreck-breaking-and-fixing-dns-implementations>

Regarding dnsop work, the same report suggests to modify RFC 5625 "DNS
Proxy Implementation Guidelines" to replace the MAY in section 6.3 by
a MUST. I think that the reason there is currently a MAY is not
because RFC 5625 finds invalid compression pointers acceptable but
simply because some proxies may not perform a full parsing of the RR
in the sections.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to