Re: [DNSOP] SVCB without A/AAAA records at the service name

[Paul Vixie]

Martin Thomson wrote on 2021-01-14 15:43:
> ...
> 
> The SVCB draft basically mandates a fallback to A/AAAA.  I think that
> this is not universal and that this should instead be made an
> option.
> 
> For HTTP, the fallback is necessary.  For a new protocol, a fallback
> could be undesirable.  Especially if you want to deploy that protocol
> using a service name on which you have already deployed HTTP.  If you
> don't want your HTTP servers getting connection attempts for the new
> protocol, the fallback is more nuisance than useful.

i see what you mean and i agree.

vixie

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop