On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:58 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> There is a fair amount of academic study around SipHash, and while > everyone can make mistakes, its creators have a pretty good reputation. I > don't think we can say SipHash is unknown in the industry. > > The TLSWG made it a practice to ask CFRG to "approve" all crypto it used > (except perhapd HKDF, but that's a side note). The DNSOP has no such > practice. > I recognize that this is a bigger issue, but I believe this should be the practice for the IETF as a whole and I would encourage the SEC ADs to work to make it so. -Ekr > If SECDIR or the Ads thinks SipHash isn't good, it would be great to hear > reasons. I haven't heard any yet. > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
