On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 6:29 AM Willem Toorop <wil...@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> Op 02-12-2020 om 23:31 schreef Stephen Farrell: > > <snip> > > > FWIW, I'd say it's worth a few more words to try reduce > > the probability of such failures happening, e.g. maybe > > just highlighting the "unsigned/2106" point you made > > above would be enough. But, if the WG don't want to do > > that, that's also fine by me. > > Sure, NP. I'll include Brian Dicksen's provided clarification in the > text. Also, I approached Jean-Philippe Aumasson and he fixed the url we > used in the draft for SipHash, but recommends to use this one in the > future: > > https://www.aumasson.jp/siphash/ It seems like kind of a problem to have a normative algorithm reference to a random personal Website. -Ekr > > So I'll change that too. > > Cheers, > -- Willem > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
