Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Benjamin's DISCUSS about the IANA issues. I'd also suggest adding text about what the possible values of the "Implementation Requirement" column are and what they mean. Further, what's the "Mnemonic" used for? That word appears nowhere in the document other than in the column headings in this section. Roman made some other good editorial suggestions. Please check those out. Section 3.3.1 says: "SIMPLE is a good choice for zones that are small and/or stable, but probably not good for zones that are large and/or dynamic." There's no alternative presented for large/dynamic zones. Are there plans to develop such a thing? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
