Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. I really like the idea of protecting the zone integrity even at rest. Please find below one non-blocking COMMENT points and one nit. I would really appreciate a reply for my comment about section 1.2. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Section 1.2 -- Why is draft-ietf-dprive-xfr-over-tls not mentioned in this section as an alternative for data on the move? == NITS == -- Section 1.4.3 -- Suggest to add "(RPZ)" after the first use of the expansion. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
