Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499

[Jared Mauch]

> On Aug 8, 2020, at 12:33 AM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> That would require a new learning curve and in addition would be only
> describing 1 aspect of a primary server. It might work when you are
> talking about XFR, but would be very confusing otherwise.

We are fundamentally talking about caching of the content. In the squid or CDN 
cases this would be parent/child, but the child is a versioned clone :-)

It may be worthwhile to look at the replicated data techniques amongst other 
protocols and services with an open mind if the WG is still thinking about the 
terminology. 

- Jared 
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop